Patient-reported outcome measure
KOOS Calculator
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
The KOOS is a 42-item patient-reported questionnaire that scores knee function as five separate subscales — Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life — each from 0 (extreme problems) to 100 (no problems).
What the KOOS score means
KOOS scores run from 0 to 100, where a higher score is better. The bands below are conventional reporting categories, not diagnostic cut-offs.
- Extreme problems0–24
- Severe problems25–49
- Moderate problems50–74
- Mild problems75–89
- No to minimal problems90–100
Clinically important thresholds
A change in score only matters if it exceeds the smallest difference patients actually notice. Every threshold below is reported with the population it was derived in — a threshold quoted without its population is not usable.
| Type | Value | Subscale | Population | Follow-up | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCID | 8–10 points | Pain | Total knee arthroplasty | 6–12 months | Roos EM 2003 |
| MCID | 8–10 points | ADL | Total knee arthroplasty | 6–12 months | Roos EM 2003 |
| MCID | 10 points | All subscales | ACL reconstruction | 12 months | Roos EM 2003 |
| PASS | ~78 points | Pain | Knee arthroplasty | 12 months | Connelly JW 2019 |
| PASS | ~63 points | QOL | Knee arthroplasty | 12 months | Connelly JW 2019 |
| MDC | 6–12 points | Varies by subscale | Knee osteoarthritis | — | Collins NJ 2011 |
MCID is the smallest change a patient perceives as meaningful. PASS is the score above which patients consider their state acceptable. SCB is a substantial rather than minimal benefit. MDC is the smallest change exceeding measurement error.
How the score is calculated
Stated in full so the calculation can be independently checked, and reproduced by hand if needed.
Each item is scored 0 to 4, where a higher raw score means worse symptoms. For each of the five subscales, the mean of that subscale's item scores is calculated, then transformed to a 0–100 scale with the formula: score = 100 − (mean item score × 100 ÷ 4). A score of 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates extreme problems. The five subscale scores are reported separately and are not averaged into a single total.
Missing data
If no more than two items in a subscale are missing, the mean of the observed items in that subscale is substituted for the missing values. If more than two items in a subscale are missing, that subscale score is not calculated. Other subscales remain valid and are still reported.
Instrument profile
- Developer
- Ewa M. Roos and colleagues
- Institution
- Lund University, Sweden
- First published
- 1998
- Custodian
- koos.nu
- Items
- 42
- Response format
- 5-point Likert, scored 0–4
- Score range
- 0 to 100
- Direction
- Higher score = better
- Recall period
- The last week
- Completion time
- About 10 minutes
- Age range
- Adults and adolescents (validated from roughly 13 years upward)
- Regions
- Knee
- Conditions
- Knee osteoarthritis, ACL injury, Meniscal injury, Post-traumatic knee injury
- Procedures
- ACL reconstruction, Meniscectomy, Total knee arthroplasty, Cartilage repair
- Languages
- English, Swedish, Spanish, German, French, Dutch, Chinese, 40+ validated translations
- Test–retest (ICC)
- 0.75–0.93 across subscales
- Internal consistency
- Cronbach's alpha 0.71–0.95
- Validity
- Strong construct validity against the WOMAC, SF-36 and Lysholm.
- Responsiveness
- Highly responsive after ACL reconstruction and arthroplasty; Sport/Rec and QOL are the most responsive subscales in younger, active patients.
- Ceiling effect
- Notable ceiling effect in the ADL subscale in young, active populations — the KOOS-Sport/Rec and QOL subscales discriminate better in that group.
- Floor effect
- Floor effects in Sport/Rec among older patients with advanced osteoarthritis, many of whom cannot attempt the activities at all.
Normative values
Reference values from published cohorts, for comparison against the score you calculated.
| Population | Age | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy reference, no knee complaints | 18–34 | 94–99 across subscales | — |
| Healthy reference, no knee complaints | 55–74 | 85–95 across subscales | — |
| Knee osteoarthritis, pre-arthroplasty | — | Pain 35–45, QOL 25–35 | — |
When to use the KOOS
Well suited to
- Following ACL reconstruction, meniscal surgery or cartilage repair, where the Sport/Rec and QOL subscales capture change that shorter instruments miss.
- Longitudinal tracking of knee osteoarthritis, including before and after arthroplasty.
- Any setting where distinguishing pain from function from quality of life changes clinical decisions.
Limitations and poor fits
- When a single summary figure is required for a registry — use the KOOS JR, which is validated as a single score, rather than averaging KOOS subscales.
- When completion burden matters and only a global measure is needed — the KOOS-12 covers the same constructs in 12 items.
- In young, highly active patients where only ADL is of interest, because of the ceiling effect.
KOOS compared with other instruments
Instruments measuring a related construct, with the practical difference between them.
| Instrument | Items | Range | What it adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| IKDC | 18 | 0–100 | The IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is an 18-item patient-reported questionnaire covering knee symptoms, sports and daily activity and current knee function, whose raw total is transformed to a 0 to 100 score where 100 means no symptoms and no activity limitation — it requires permission from the AOSSM, so the items are not reproduced here. |
| Lysholm | 8 | 0–100 | The Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale is an eight-domain questionnaire that rates knee symptoms and function — limp, support, locking, instability, pain, swelling, stair climbing and squatting — on a 0 to 100 scale, where 95 and above is graded excellent, 84 to 94 good, 65 to 83 fair, and below 65 poor. |
Copyright and permitted use
Published openly because it is the question every clinician and researcher asks before using an instrument, and almost nobody answers it.
The KOOS is distributed free of charge by its developer for clinical and research use, and the questionnaire and scoring instructions are published openly at koos.nu.
Rights holder’s own pageReferences
- Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) — development of a self-administered outcome measure. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1998.PMID 9699158
- Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2003.doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-64PMID 14613558
- Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM. Measures of knee function. Arthritis Care & Research. 2011.doi:10.1002/acr.20632PMID 22588746
- Paradowski PT, Bergman S, Sundén-Lundius A, Lohmander LS, Roos EM. Knee complaints vary with age and gender in the adult population. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2006.doi:10.1186/1471-2474-7-38PMID 16670005
- Connelly JW, Galea VP, Rojanasopondist P, et al.. Patient acceptable symptom state at 1 and 3 years after total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2019.doi:10.2106/JBJS.18.00233PMID 30801373
Editorial status
Not yet reviewedQueued for clinical review by Sam Tuffun, PT, DPT. Sign-off has not taken place — this is a placeholder assignment, not a completed review.