Patient-reported outcome measure
FAOS Calculator
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score
The FAOS is a 42-item patient-reported questionnaire adapted from the KOOS that scores foot and ankle problems as five separate subscales — Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life — each from 0 (extreme problems) to 100 (no problems).
What the FAOS score means
FAOS scores run from 0 to 100, where a higher score is better. The bands below are conventional reporting categories, not diagnostic cut-offs.
- Extreme problems0–24
- Severe problems25–49
- Moderate problems50–74
- Mild problems75–89
- No to minimal problems90–100
Clinically important thresholds
A change in score only matters if it exceeds the smallest difference patients actually notice. Every threshold below is reported with the population it was derived in — a threshold quoted without its population is not usable.
| Type | Value | Subscale | Population | Follow-up | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCID | 10 points | All subscales | Ankle disorders, by analogy with the KOOS | — | Roos EM 2001 |
| MDC | 10–20 points depending on subscale | — | Chronic ankle instability | — | Sierevelt IN 2018 |
MCID is the smallest change a patient perceives as meaningful. PASS is the score above which patients consider their state acceptable. SCB is a substantial rather than minimal benefit. MDC is the smallest change exceeding measurement error.
How the score is calculated
Stated in full so the calculation can be independently checked, and reproduced by hand if needed.
Each item is scored 0 to 4, where a higher raw score means worse symptoms. For each of the five subscales the mean of that subscale’s item scores is calculated, then transformed to a 0–100 scale with the formula: score = 100 − (mean item score × 100 ÷ 4). A score of 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates extreme problems. The five subscale scores are reported separately and are not averaged into a single total.
Missing data
If no more than two items in a subscale are missing, the mean of the observed items in that subscale is substituted for the missing values. If more than two items in a subscale are missing, that subscale score is not calculated; the remaining subscales stay valid and are still reported.
Instrument profile
- Developer
- Ewa M. Roos and colleagues
- Institution
- Lund University, Sweden
- First published
- 2001
- Custodian
- koos.nu
- Items
- 42
- Response format
- 5-point Likert, scored 0–4
- Score range
- 0 to 100
- Direction
- Higher score = better
- Recall period
- The last week
- Completion time
- About 10 minutes
- Age range
- Adults
- Regions
- Foot & Ankle
- Conditions
- Ankle instability, Ankle osteoarthritis, Ankle sprain, Achilles tendinopathy, Hallux valgus, Ankle fracture
- Procedures
- Ankle ligament reconstruction, Ankle arthrodesis, Total ankle arthroplasty, Ankle fracture fixation
- Languages
- English, Swedish, Dutch, German, Persian, Turkish, Chinese
- Test–retest (ICC)
- 0.86–0.92 across subscales
- Internal consistency
- Cronbach's alpha 0.78–0.96
- Validity
- Adapted directly from the KOOS with the same structure and scoring. Content validity for forefoot problems is weaker than for the ankle, because several items are knee-derived.
- Responsiveness
- Responsive after ankle ligament reconstruction and ankle fracture. The Sport/Rec and QOL subscales carry most of the signal in active patients.
- Ceiling effect
- Ceiling effect in the ADL subscale in patients with isolated forefoot pathology, many of whom have no difficulty with the listed activities.
Normative values
Reference values from published cohorts, for comparison against the score you calculated.
| Population | Age | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy reference, no foot or ankle complaint | — | 90–100 across subscales | — |
| Chronic ankle instability | — | Sport/Rec 45–60 | — |
When to use the FAOS
Well suited to
- Ankle instability, ankle osteoarthritis and ankle fracture follow-up, where the five-subscale structure separates pain from function from quality of life.
- Studies wanting direct structural comparability with KOOS and HOOS data.
Limitations and poor fits
- Isolated forefoot pathology such as hallux valgus, where several items are irrelevant and the FAAM or a forefoot-specific measure fits better.
- When a single summary score is required — the FAOS has no validated total.
- Where completion burden matters; the FAAM is 29 items and the CAIT is 9.
FAOS compared with other instruments
Instruments measuring a related construct, with the practical difference between them.
| Instrument | Items | Range | What it adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAAM | 29 | 0–100 | The FAAM is a 29-item patient-reported questionnaire for musculoskeletal disorders of the leg, foot and ankle that produces two separate subscale scores — Activities of Daily Living from 21 items and Sports from 8 items — each expressed from 0% (unable to perform the listed activities) to 100% (no limitation). |
| FADI | 34 | 0–100 | The Foot and Ankle Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire of 26 scored items — 22 activities and 4 pain items, each rated 0 to 4 for a maximum of 104 — with an optional 8-item sports subscale out of 32, where a higher score means less disability. |
| LEFS | 20 | 0–80 | The LEFS is a 20-item patient-reported questionnaire that measures difficulty with everyday lower limb activities on a single 0 to 80 scale, where 80 indicates no difficulty and a change of 9 points is the smallest difference patients reliably notice. |
| KOOS | 42 | 0–100 | The KOOS is a 42-item patient-reported questionnaire that scores knee function as five separate subscales — Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life — each from 0 (extreme problems) to 100 (no problems). |
Copyright and permitted use
Published openly because it is the question every clinician and researcher asks before using an instrument, and almost nobody answers it.
The FAOS is distributed free of charge by its developer for clinical and research use, alongside the KOOS and HOOS, with the questionnaire and scoring instructions published openly at koos.nu.
Rights holder’s own pageReferences
- Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot & Ankle International. 2001.PMID 11669161
- Sierevelt IN, Beimers L, van Bergen CJA, Haverkamp D, Terwee CB, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Validation of the Dutch language version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015.PMID 25655383
- Sierevelt IN, Zwiers R, Schats W, et al.. Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM — a systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2018.PMID 29138918
Editorial status
Not yet reviewedQueued for clinical review by Sam Tuffun, PT, DPT. Sign-off has not taken place — this is a placeholder assignment, not a completed review.