Patient-reported outcome measure
HOOS Calculator
Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
The HOOS is a 40-item patient-reported questionnaire that scores hip function as five separate subscales — Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation, and Hip-related Quality of Life — each from 0 (extreme problems) to 100 (no problems).
What the HOOS score means
HOOS scores run from 0 to 100, where a higher score is better. The bands below are conventional reporting categories, not diagnostic cut-offs.
- Extreme problems0–24
- Severe problems25–49
- Moderate problems50–74
- Mild problems75–89
- No to minimal problems90–100
Clinically important thresholds
A change in score only matters if it exceeds the smallest difference patients actually notice. Every threshold below is reported with the population it was derived in — a threshold quoted without its population is not usable.
| Type | Value | Subscale | Population | Follow-up | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCID | 10 points | All subscales | Total hip arthroplasty | 6–12 months | Nilsdotter AK 2003 |
| MCID | ~9 points | Pain | Hip osteoarthritis, non-surgical | — | Nilsdotter A 2011 |
| PASS | ~73 points | Pain | Hip arthroscopy for FAI | 12 months | Nwachukwu BU 2017 |
| MDC | 10–16 points | Varies by subscale | Hip osteoarthritis | — | Nilsdotter A 2011 |
MCID is the smallest change a patient perceives as meaningful. PASS is the score above which patients consider their state acceptable. SCB is a substantial rather than minimal benefit. MDC is the smallest change exceeding measurement error.
How the score is calculated
Stated in full so the calculation can be independently checked, and reproduced by hand if needed.
Each item is scored 0 to 4, where a higher raw score means worse symptoms. For each of the five subscales the mean of that subscale’s item scores is calculated, then transformed to a 0–100 scale with the formula: score = 100 − (mean item score × 100 ÷ 4). A score of 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates extreme problems. The five subscale scores are reported separately and are not averaged into a single total.
Missing data
If no more than two items in a subscale are missing, the mean of the observed items in that subscale is substituted for the missing values. If more than two items in a subscale are missing, that subscale score is not calculated; the remaining subscales stay valid and are still reported.
Instrument profile
- Developer
- Ewa M. Roos, Lars S. Lohmander and colleagues
- Institution
- Lund University, Sweden
- First published
- 2003
- Custodian
- koos.nu
- Items
- 40
- Response format
- 5-point Likert, scored 0–4
- Score range
- 0 to 100
- Direction
- Higher score = better
- Recall period
- The last week
- Completion time
- About 10 minutes
- Age range
- Adults
- Regions
- Hip
- Conditions
- Hip osteoarthritis, Femoroacetabular impingement, Hip dysplasia, Hip pain
- Procedures
- Total hip arthroplasty, Hip arthroscopy, Periacetabular osteotomy
- Languages
- English, Swedish, Danish, Dutch, German, Spanish, 30+ validated translations
- Test–retest (ICC)
- 0.78–0.93 across subscales
- Internal consistency
- Cronbach's alpha 0.82–0.98
- Validity
- Strong construct validity against the WOMAC, which is fully contained within the HOOS, and against the SF-36 physical subscales.
- Responsiveness
- Highly responsive after total hip arthroplasty. The Sport/Rec and QOL subscales are the most responsive in younger patients and in hip arthroscopy cohorts.
- Ceiling effect
- Ceiling effect in the ADL subscale after successful arthroplasty, where many patients score at or near 100.
- Floor effect
- Floor effects in Sport/Rec among older patients with advanced osteoarthritis who cannot attempt the activities at all.
Normative values
Reference values from published cohorts, for comparison against the score you calculated.
| Population | Age | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy reference, no hip complaints | 18–34 | 95–100 across subscales | — |
| Hip osteoarthritis, pre-arthroplasty | — | Pain 35–45, QOL 25–35 | — |
When to use the HOOS
Well suited to
- Hip osteoarthritis and total hip arthroplasty, before and after surgery.
- Younger, active hip patients — femoroacetabular impingement, dysplasia, hip arthroscopy — where the Sport/Rec and QOL subscales capture change the WOMAC misses.
- Any setting where pain, function and quality of life need to be distinguished from one another.
Limitations and poor fits
- When a single registry-friendly summary figure is required — use the HOOS JR, which is validated as a single score, rather than averaging HOOS subscales.
- When completion burden matters and only a global measure is needed — the HOOS-12 covers the same constructs in 12 items.
- For non-arthritic groin and athletic hip pain, where the HAGOS was designed specifically for that population.
HOOS compared with other instruments
Instruments measuring a related construct, with the practical difference between them.
| Instrument | Items | Range | What it adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harris Hip Score | — | 0–100 | The Harris Hip Score is a 100-point clinician-administered hip assessment combining 44 points for pain, 47 for function, 4 for absence of deformity and 5 for range of motion, where 90 or above is graded excellent and below 70 poor. |
| HOS | 26 | 0–100 | The Hip Outcome Score is a 28-item patient-reported questionnaire for non-arthritic hip conditions that yields two independent percentage scores — an Activities of Daily Living subscale, administered as 19 questions of which 17 are scored, and a 9-item Sports subscale — each running from 0% (unable to perform the listed activities) to 100% (no difficulty at all). |
| KOOS | 42 | 0–100 | The KOOS is a 42-item patient-reported questionnaire that scores knee function as five separate subscales — Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life — each from 0 (extreme problems) to 100 (no problems). |
Copyright and permitted use
Published openly because it is the question every clinician and researcher asks before using an instrument, and almost nobody answers it.
The HOOS is distributed free of charge by its developer for clinical and research use, and the questionnaire and scoring instructions are published openly at koos.nu alongside the KOOS.
Rights holder’s own pageReferences
- Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) — validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2003.doi:10.1186/1471-2474-4-10PMID 12777182
- Nilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms. Arthritis Care & Research. 2011.doi:10.1002/acr.20549PMID 22588772
- Paradowski PT, Bergman S, Sundén-Lundius A, Lohmander LS, Roos EM. Knee complaints vary with age and gender in the adult population. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2006.doi:10.1186/1471-2474-7-38PMID 16670005
- Nwachukwu BU, Fields K, Chang B, Nawabi DH, Kelly BT, Ranawat AS. Preoperative outcome scores are predictive of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017.PMID 28282508
Editorial status
Not yet reviewedQueued for clinical review by Sam Tuffun, PT, DPT. Sign-off has not taken place — this is a placeholder assignment, not a completed review.