Skip to content

Clinical calculator

LCEA Calculator

Lateral Centre-Edge Angle of Wiberg

The lateral centre-edge angle measures how far the acetabulum covers the femoral head laterally on an anteroposterior pelvis radiograph, where below 18 degrees indicates frank dysplasia, 18 to 25 degrees is borderline, 25 to 39 degrees is normal, and 40 degrees or more indicates overcoverage.

No licence required1 items~1 min0–60, higher is better

Radiographic measurement

Measure on a standing anteroposterior pelvis radiograph. Draw a vertical line through the centre of the femoral head, perpendicular to the inter-teardrop line, and a second line from the centre of the femoral head to the lateral edge of the sourcil. The angle between them is the LCEA.

Record which lateral landmark you used — the lateral edge of the sourcil, or the lateral edge of the bony acetabulum.

°

What the LCEA score means

LCEA scores run from 0 to 60, where a higher score is better. The bands below are conventional reporting categories, not diagnostic cut-offs.

  • Frank acetabular dysplasia-90–17.9

    An LCEA below 18° is widely accepted as frank dysplasia. Undercoverage of this degree is associated with early degenerative change and is the range in which periacetabular osteotomy is most often considered.

  • Borderline dysplasia18–24.9

    The 18–25° range is contested. Some of these hips are unstable and behave like dysplasia, others are not; the decision rests on the whole picture including the Tönnis angle, femoral version and the presence of a labral tear.

  • Normal acetabular coverage25–39.9

    Within the normal range for lateral coverage of the femoral head.

  • Acetabular overcoverage40–90

    An LCEA of 40° or more indicates overcoverage, associated with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. Beyond roughly 40° this may represent coxa profunda or protrusio.

Published criteria and reliability

The published cut-offs that define this instrument, and the measured agreement between observers using it. Each is reported with the population it was derived in.

TypeValueSubscalePopulationFollow-upSource
Criterion< 18° — frank acetabular dysplasia—Adults, AP pelvis radiograph—Wiberg G 1939
Criterion18–25° — borderline dysplasia—Adults, AP pelvis radiograph—Wyles CC 2017
Criterion25–39° — normal—Adults, AP pelvis radiograph—Tönnis D 1987
Criterion≥ 40° — overcoverage, associated with pincer impingement—Adults, AP pelvis radiograph—Tönnis D 1987
CriterionLCEA below 20° was strongly associated with subsequent hip osteoarthritis—Long-term follow-up of dysplastic hips—Wyles CC 2017

Criterion is a published cut-off, definition or performance figure belonging to a classification or decision rule — it is not a change score and should not be read as one.

How the score is calculated

Stated in full so the calculation can be independently checked, and reproduced by hand if needed.

A vertical reference line is drawn through the centre of the femoral head, perpendicular to a horizontal line joining the inferior aspects of the two teardrops. A second line is drawn from the centre of the femoral head to the lateral edge of the acetabular sourcil. The lateral centre-edge angle is the angle between these two lines. A larger angle means greater lateral coverage of the femoral head.

Instrument profile

Developer
Gunnar Wiberg
Institution
Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
First published
1939
Items
1
Response format
Single angular measurement in degrees
Score range
0 to 60
Direction
Higher score = better
Completion time
About 1 minutes
Age range
Adults and skeletally mature adolescents
Regions
Hip
Conditions
Hip dysplasia, Femoroacetabular impingement, Acetabular undercoverage, Hip instability, Labral tear
Procedures
Periacetabular osteotomy, Hip arthroscopy
Observer agreement
Interobserver ICC typically 0.86–0.96 when the landmark definition is standardised
Validity
The most widely used measure of acetabular coverage, and the parameter on which dysplasia thresholds and periacetabular osteotomy indications are built.
Reliability
Reliability is good but depends heavily on radiographic technique and on which lateral landmark is used. Pelvic rotation and tilt both alter the measured angle, and the sourcil and bony-edge definitions can differ by several degrees on the same film.

Normative values

Reference values from published cohorts, for comparison against the score you calculated.

PopulationAgeMeanSD
Asymptomatic adults—32–366
Symptomatic dysplasia referred for periacetabular osteotomy—12–18—

When to use the LCEA

Well suited to

  • Assessing acetabular coverage in suspected hip dysplasia or femoroacetabular impingement.
  • Pre-operative planning for periacetabular osteotomy or hip arthroscopy.
  • Screening young adults presenting with hip or groin pain.

Limitations and poor fits

  • On a poorly centred or rotated AP pelvis film, where the measurement is unreliable.
  • In skeletally immature patients, where the acetabular index is the appropriate measure.
  • As a sole assessment of coverage — anterior and posterior coverage need a false-profile view and the posterior wall sign.

LCEA compared with other instruments

Instruments measuring a related construct, with the practical difference between them.

InstrumentItemsRangeWhat it adds
Tönnis Angle1-10–30The Tönnis angle measures the slope of the acetabular weight-bearing zone on an anteroposterior pelvis radiograph, where 0 to 10 degrees is normal, above 10 degrees indicates a steep upsloping roof associated with dysplasia and instability, and a negative angle indicates overcoverage.
Alpha Angle130–90The alpha angle quantifies loss of sphericity at the femoral head-neck junction, the imaging marker of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement, with published thresholds for cam morphology ranging from 50 to 60 degrees depending on the imaging view used.
Crowe21–4The Crowe classification grades developmental dysplasia of the hip in adults by how far the femoral head has migrated proximally, expressed as a percentage of the femoral head height and estimated from the pelvic height, giving four types: under 50%, 50–75%, 75–100% and over 100% subluxation.
HOOS400–100The HOOS is a 40-item patient-reported questionnaire that scores hip function as five separate subscales — Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation, and Hip-related Quality of Life — each from 0 (extreme problems) to 100 (no problems).

Copyright and permitted use

Published openly because it is the question every clinician and researcher asks before using an instrument, and almost nobody answers it.

No licence required

A published radiographic measurement method. Freely reproducible; no licence is required.

References

  1. Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica. 1939.
  2. Tönnis D. Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. Springer-Verlag. 1987.
  3. Wyles CC, Heidenreich MJ, Jeng J, Larson DR, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. The John Charnley Award: redefining the natural history of osteoarthritis in patients with hip dysplasia and impingement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2017.PMID 27830486

Editorial status

This page has not yet been signed off by a named clinical reviewer. The scoring logic is stated in full above so it can be independently verified, and every threshold is traceable to its source. See our editorial methodology.